"Shortly(1*) after the Reformation, we find two great schools of thought dividing this class of subjects between them. The most influential of the two was at first the sect of school known to us as the Casuists, all of them in spiritual communion with the Roman Catholic Church, and nearly all of them affiliated to one or other of her religious orders. On the other side were a body of writer connected with each other by a common intellectual descent from the great author of the treatise De Jure Belli et Pacis, Hugo Grotius. Almost all of the latter were adherents of the Reformation, and though it cannot be said that they were formally and avowedly at conflict with the Casuists, the origin and object of their system were nevertheless essentially different from those of Casuistry. It is necessary to call attention to this difference, because it involves the question of the influence of Roman law on that department of thought with which both systems are concerned. The book of Grotius, though it touches questions of pure Ethics in every page, and though it is the parent immediate or remote of innumerable volumes of formal morality, is not, as is well known, a professed treatise on Moral Philosophy; it is an attempt to determine the Law of Nature, or Natural Law. Now, without entering upon the question, whether the conception of a Law Natural be not exclusively a creation of the Roman jurisconsults, we may lay down that, even on the admission of Grotius himself, the dicta of the Roman jurisprudence as to what parts of known positive law must be taken to be parts of the Law of Nature, are, if not infallible, to be received at all events with the profoundest respect. Hence the system of Grotius is implicated with Roman law at its very foundation, and this connection rendered inevitable -- what the legal training of the writer would perhaps have entailed without it -- the free employment in every paragraph of technical phraseology, and of modes of reasoning, defining, and illustrating, which must sometimes conceal the sense, and almost always the force and cogency, of the argument from the reader who is unfamiliar with the sources whence they have been derived. On the other hand, Casuistry borrows little from Roman law, and the views of morality contended for have nothing whatever in common with the undertaking of Grotius. All that philosophy of right and wrong which has become famous, or infamous, under the name of Casuistry, had its origin in the distinction between Mortal and Venial Sin. A natural anxiety to escape the awful consequences of determining a particular act to be mortally sinful, and a desire, equally intelligible, to assist the Roman Catholic Church in its conflict with Protestantism by disburthening it of an inconvenient theory, were the motives which impelled the authors of the Casuistical philosophy to the invention of an elaborate system of criteria, intended to remove immoral actions, in as many cases as possible, out of the category of mortal offences, and to stamp them as venial sins. The fate of this experiment is matter of ordinary history. We know that the distinctions of Casuistry, by enabling the priesthood to adjust spiritual control to all the varieties of human character, did really confer on it an influence with princes, statesmen, and generals, unheard of in the ages before the Reformation, and did really contribute largely to that great reaction which checked and narrowed the first successes of Protestantism. But beginning in the attempt, not to establish, but to evade -- not to discover a principle, but to escape a postulate -- not to settle the nature of right and wrong, but to determine what was not wrong of a particular nature, -- Casuistry went on with its dexterous refinements till it ended in so attenuating the moral features of actions, and so belying the moral instincts of Our being, that at length the conscience of mankind rose suddenly in revolt against it, and consigned to one common ruin the system and its doctors. The blow, long pending, was finally struck in the Provincial Letters of Pascal, and since the appearance of those memorable Papers, no moralist of the smallest influence or credit has ever avowedly conducted his speculations in the footsteps of the Casuists. The whole field of ethical science was thus left at the exclusive command of the writers who followed Grotius; and it still exhibits in an extraordinary degree the traces of that entanglement with Roman law which is sometimes imputed as a fault, and sometimes the highest of its recommendations, to the Grotian theory Many inquirers since Grotius's day have modified his principles, and many, of course, since the rise of the Critical Philosophy, have quite deserted them; but even those who have departed most widely from his fundamental assumptions have inherited much of his method of statement, of his train of thought, and of his mode of illustration; and these have little meaning and no point to the person ignorant of Roman jurisprudence."I have already said that, with the exception of the physical sciences, there is no walk of knowledge which has been so slightly affected by Roman law as Metaphysics. The reason is that discussion on metaphysical subjects has always been conducted in Greek, first in pure Greek, and afterwards in a dialect of Latin expressly constructed to give expression to Greek conceptions.
同类推荐
热门推荐
绝世盛宠:君上,太妖娆
『绝宠1V1』夜兮从未想过自己好端端睡个觉却忽然穿越到了一个不知名的国度,还成了世家大小姐。不过这大小姐好像有点不受宠,原因呢?原因呢!?竟然是因为自己是废柴长得丑还霸占着“英明神武”太子殿下!!!心塞,知道什么叫逆袭吗?说本菇凉是废物?给我一把剑,诛你九族信不信。长得丑?连你们“英明神武的太子殿下”都围在本菇凉身边。不过就是为毛身边老跟着一个帝君???还能不能愉快的玩耍了!!!某男邪邪一笑:“玩?兮儿要怎么玩,本君奉陪。”某兮秒怂“不…不用了……”摄政王家的战神王妃
初见,她十一岁,他九岁“我的贞操已经给了你了,以后你就是我的人了,等以后我娶你”“小鬼头,你才多大呀,净想这些有的没的,再说了,本小姐才不会嫁给你呢!”“你——你都亲我了,难道你还想嫁给别人不成?”“我刚才那是在救你,你别不识好歹!”“我——我不管,反正你亲我了,以后我就娶你。”“我以后喜欢的人会是一个盖世英雄,我能提笔安天下,武能上马定乾坤,绝对不会嫁你这种小鬼头的。”“那等我变成了那种人,我就来娶你”“再说吧,我送你回家。”…………再见,她是朝堂上,翻手为云覆手为雨的第一女相国,而他是敌国的摄政王。她奉旨嫁他,可谁知当初的小鬼头早已不复当年模样。“娘子——,我能坐吗?”在外狠辣无情的他,到了她面前乖的跟猫咪一样。“你——你好好说话”在外叱咤风云的她,在他面前手足无措。这是专属于他们两个人的甜蜜。